Spam Filters Reviews

Google
  Web ConsumerSearch.com   
Reviewing the Reviews Home Category Index Shop Newsletter Search About Us

Spam Filters Reviews

Updated January 2008

Best Spam Filters Reviews: (out of 33)
Network World.com, About.com, About.com

Best Spam Filters: (out of 37)
MailWasher Pro 6.1, OnlyMyEmail, Cloudmark Desktop 5.3/3.2.2

Fast Answers - Best Spam Filters
Top Rated What the Research Says
•  MailWasher Pro 6.1
   (*est. $40)

>> Where to buy

Best aggressive desktop spam filter.

Taking a kitchen-sink approach, MailWasher uses whitelist, blacklist, database and learning filters to filter e-mail before it reaches a user's inbox. While it requires some initial training to learn what you consider to be spam, MailWasher eventually achieves a very high accuracy rate. Because of its aggressive approach, it also generates false positives. Most reviewers find Windows-only MailWasher to be easy to use and like the fact that it works with most e-mail programs. The program has no ongoing costs, but Firetrust (the developer) is in New Zealand and has no toll-free phone number.
•  OnlyMyEmail
   (*est. $4 per month)

>> Where to buy

Best web-based spam filtering service.

OnlyMyEmail is strongly recommended in several reviews, but the service has some detractors, too. Since OnlyMyEmail isn't downloaded to your computer, system performance isn't impacted and spam never makes it to your computer. You can direct up to two e-mail accounts to OnlyMyEmail, where your mail is filtered and sent to your OnlyMyEmail address (which you can then direct to your desktop e-mail client). Reviews say OnlyMyEmail is amazingly accurate, with an extremely low occurrence of misidentified legitimate mail. OnlyMyEmail will work with any operating system. Compared to other software, however, the yearly ongoing cost is very high.
•  Cloudmark Desktop 5.3/3.2.2
   (*est. $40)

>> Where to buy

Best low-risk anti-spam software.

Reviews like the community-based approach taken by Cloudmark Desktop, which uses an ever-growing database of known spammers to filter messages. More than a million program users send information to Cloudmark, which comes in separate versions for Outlook (version 5.3) and Outlook Express (3.2.2). Because no spam filter is perfect, you will still get some false positives. There is no Mac version. You must renew your subscription each year in order for Cloudmark to remain effective, which makes Cloudmark costly in the long term.
•  CA Anti-Spam Plus CA Website Inspector 2008
   (*est. $50)

>> Where to buy

Best whitelist spam filter.

CA Anti-Spam allows mail from people you know (your whitelist) and quarantines everything else. Though the very latest version is yet to be reviewed, experts say the whitelist filter used in CA Anti-Spam is highly effective. However, they add that whitelist filtering works best for people who only receive mail from people they know, and that it isn't the best choice for those who often receive legitimate mail from e-mail addresses that aren't in their contacts folder. The whitelist method of filtering should block all spam, but when used exclusively, it will also block the highest percentage of legitimate mail. For that reason, experts either love or hate CA Anti-Spam.
•  POPFile 1.0
   (free, http://popfile.sourceforge.net/)

>> Where to buy

Free spam blocker.

Reviewers say that that POPFile is better than most other free spam blockers, and at least one rates it ahead of any of the many commercial programs he's reviewed. However, POPFile can be intimidating for novices, and it requires a fair amount of training before it learns what you consider to be spam. POPFile also takes some knocks for creating system drag. POPFile is an open-source program that works with all operating systems.
>>  Comparison Chart

Full Story
What the experts say, our analysis, and more...
Updated January 2008

Spam filters, also called spam blockers or anti-spam software, attempt to separate your legitimate e-mail from spam. Reviews say spam filters vary in their ability to detect and remove spam. More importantly, the products are controversial because they can falsely identify legitimate e-mail as spam (called a false positive). Reviews evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of spam filters, along with features, ease of use and potential drain on your system resources.

Government and independent studies show spam is increasing. Barracuda Networks analyzed more than a billion e-mail messages sent to the company's customers, and found that more than 90 percent of them were spam. Scott Petry of e-mail security firm Postini says spam is evolving into new forms. It is hidden in e-mail attachments such as PDFs, MP3s, Microsoft Office documents and JPEGs. Experts also say that more spam is filtered before e-mail users ever see it. That's partly because Internet service providers are doing a better job of weeding out spam. ISPs and large companies use expensive hardware spam filters. Bill Gates says that spam filters integrated into recent Microsoft products deserve some credit for a reduction in received spam, but also credits the third-party solutions. Both are covered in this report.

We found no documentation that suggests computer users are less concerned about spam, but the quantity and quality of spam filter reviews has declined steadily in the past couple of years. Some of the most reliable reviewers, such as Consumer Reports, PC World and PC Magazine are not up-to-date in their coverage. Heinz Tschabitscher, About.com's Guide to E-mail, provides many good reviews of both free and commercial anti-spam programs. The limitation is that he doesn't conduct formal performance tests. (Note that ConsumerSearch is affiliated with About.com, but has no editorial relationship.) Almost all the reviews that show the percentage of snagged spam and false positives in formal tests are of previous versions of programs.

Brockmann and Company, a consulting firm, conducted a survey of more than 500 businesses to learn about their satisfaction with various methods of spam filtering and some specific products. A couple of free, open-source spam filters registered the lowest level of satisfaction in Brockmann's study: SpamPal and SpamAssassin. Tschabitscher rates SpamPal as at least average, but notes that its blacklist is not well-maintained. In his WinPlanet.com review, Adam Stone says the program "requires more configuration to work with Outlook/Outlook Express than competing tools." He is also concerned about false positives.

About.com's Tschabitscher generally rates free programs as highly as commercial anti-spam software, but he is far more impressed with MailWasher Pro 6.1 (*est. $40) than its truncated free sibling. The free version doesn't work with web-based e-mail services, nor does it use blacklist filtering or have learning capability. Tschabitscher rates nine programs over SpamExperts Desktop 1.2, another free alternative. It has several weaknesses, including slow processing and filtering of e-mail.  ... Continued

Consensus Report

Our Consensus Report shows how many times products are top-ranked by reviewers included in our
All The Reviews Reviewed chart.

# of Picks Model (With Retailer Links) Details from Amazon.com
3 POPFile 1.0.0 (free) -
2 MailWasher Pro 6.1 (*est. $40) -
2 Cloudmark Desktop 5.3/3.2.2 (*est. $40) -
2 Allume SpamCatcher 4.0 (*est. $30) details
1 each ClearMyMail, Death2Spam, Ella for Spam Control, eXpurgate, MailWasher (free), Sendio, Spam Cube, Spam Arrest, SpamBayes, SPAMfighter Pro v6, Spamihilator 0.9.9.37, SpamSieve, Windows Mail Junk Filter , OnlyMyEmail, Vanquish vqME, CA Anti-Spam

Due to a dearth of reviews in the past couple of years, we found few recommendations for current versions of many programs. MailWasher Pro and Cloudmark Desktop have been favorites of reviewers for years, and continue to receive the most favorable reviews. The two programs aren't similar. Cloudmark is a community-based filter; it screens e-mail identified as spam by its large community of users. MailWasher uses all the other methods of filtering.

POPFile is clearly the favorite free program of reviews. They site reasons why it isn't for everybody. Its Bayesian filter requires a time commitment to train. It's more complex to use than the best commercial programs, and support is limited to other users. There have been no reviews yet of the very latest version, but CA Anti-Spam is most highly regarded whitelist filter, though it is not without its detractors. OnlyMyEmail continues as the top rated web-based spam filter despite a price increase.

Advertisement
Spam Filters Reviews